Malcolm T. Liepke

Malcolm T. Liepke’s work is beautiful. It is unabashed, confident, and human. He does plenty of portraits, yes. Portraits of females posing in various fashions, many looking directly out into the viewer’s eyes. These can be interesting paintings, to be sure, though many feel a tad too artificial for me. I see so much more depth of talent to those paintings that appear as scenes. You see, Liepke has a way of composing these paintings that subtly masks layers of content in simple strokes of paint. The longer I look, the more intricately I see a narrative blossoming from the weaving of brushstrokes and color.

Oh–and I’ll go ahead and warn you that I resorted to making many a list in this post.

The Brushstrokes: A Duality

A Mother’s Kiss

Figure 1: A Mother’s Kiss

The paint is thick, and the strokes are often wide-set; there is a physical weight to material here, and so subjects appear decidedly set, unchangeably anchored in their place. That is where they are and where they are meant to be. Indeed, sometimes Liepke increases this formal stability by including strong horizontal and/or vertical lines in the scenes, such as a corner of a wall, a frame, or the position of a limb. There usually isn’t too much detail in the scenery, but Liepke almost always includes an object with a strong horizontal or vertical orientation (see Figure 1).

Yet, despite this build-up of material and texture, the figures do not seem stoic and weighted. These brushstrokes are painterly. They are not perfectly blended, nor are they all contained within the shape they intend to create. There are “stray” strokes and those of different thicknesses. Yes, these brushstrokes can be awkward, variable, and imperfect: (dare I say?!) they echo the nature of the human that made them.

The Poses

Now, if nothing else, Liepke understands how to pose models. They are not in ridiculous poses, but he seems to amp-up the drama of a natural pose. How? So far as I can tell, it’s all about the angles, and he uses contrasting tones/hues to accentuate those lines. For example, arms are usually bent into sharp angles, and I’ll argue that these positions invite even more energy into the painting. How so?

1. Look at a bent arm. The diagonal lines that position creates suggests movement and energy. Think of a slide, a ladder, stairs, a lever.

2. Bend your arm. It takes energy to do that, to keep your arm bent. Not only that, your arm doesn’t stay bent; it naturally extends. There is kinetic energy in a sharply angled arm.

3. An arm is distinctly horizontal. When this happens, the subject is often applying weight to it (i.e. leaning against it). The muscle looks taut or stretched. There is force applied and force resisting.

It isn’t only arms. Sometimes Liepke angles bodies to be distinctly diagonal.

The Background

Figure 2

Figure 2

Even backgrounds have a presence; thick, immovable paint strokes. They create an fascinating “negative space” that, well, acts somewhat like negative space. The space balances the foreground figures at least. However, the “blank space” is not really very blank but dynamic in its own right. Look at the blank walls or the sand that surrounds figures: if you single these areas out, they bloom into spaces brimming with activity (see Figure 2).

Such a dynamic background seems to move forward in the painting. It’s fascinating, the duality that arises here. At one moment (when you are focusing on the foreground figures) the background objects appear far away, but as you focus on those backgrounds, they blossom forward in space. Neat!

The Frame and The Scene

Figure 2

Figure 3

I must also comment on the expert framing of these scenes. Liepke employs delicate details to suggest life outside the image itself, to hint of a world that expands beyond. For example:
1. A subject is sometimes leaning off the side and out of the picture, and that tends to lead the viewer’s eyes out of the image, too. (Thanks, diagonal lines!)

2. A subjects’ eyes are focused on something outside of the picture. You can follow their line of sight all the way…off the painting.

3. The subject’s entire body does not fit into the frame. OK, sure, that is normal in portraiture; often the lower half of the body is missing. However, these subjects are missing a foot, a forehead, an elbow, a knee… Your gaze catches on the unexpected loss.

Figure 3

Figure 3

4. Subjects are placed off-center. Not just off-center. The meat of the image can be piled onto one side (see Figure 3). Indeed, it seems as though the artist just took a quick snapshot of the situation, so eager to capture the feelings of the moment, he forgot to center the subject in the frame.

5. Liepke sneaks the “way out” into the frame. Sometimes it is obvious and you can see the room stretch out and fade into darkness. Sometimes he will squeeze in a sliver of a horizon line, a corner of a wall, or a window. These areas are also dark and lack detail, expanding to who-knows-where. Within these holes of darkness, the world has unlimited distance and space, without which the whole scene might appear much more flat.

But despite these “hints”, Liepke does not distract from the scene itself. He makes quite sure that forms are visually balanced and that lines leading off the page have a path back (eee Figure 4). The painting can formally stand on its own, but it stirs and ignites the viewer’s belief and curiosity in the world beyond the frame.

Here are a few thoughts from the artist himself:

“I see a girl with her head a certain way, and I find it telling, emotional, and I want to communicate that certain truth…That truth or emotion makes us feel less alone, more human. Everyone goes through life with their own problems, but we live in a pretty universal world. I’ve found that the more personal the piece, the more people connect with it.”1

“Learning to edit, to keep loose, is a lifelong process…In the beginning it’s natural to noodle everything to death, but slowly you can learn to say more with less, to make sure each brushstroke has meaning.”1

“The biggest thing about my art is getting my mind to open to the point where it comes tumbling out. I can’t think about brushstrokes. If I think too consciously, my arm freezes up.”1

“Although I do think about the things I am expressing, I try to make it as direct as I can—I try not to get in the way of the emotions…In essence, I believe that no matter how alone we may feel in the world—how we imagine we are experiencing things in a vacuum—we all share the same human experiences. We all have the same basic needs for connection, love, and understanding. I try to reach those universal needs; it’s what’s primal in art. I try to say it through mood, color, atmosphere, and texture. Bottom line: it’s the emotional, and I just want to get it out. It’s difficult to express through words things that are so beautiful that they have no words. I can’t explain it. I have to paint it.”

Well, said, Malcolm. Well said.

1.Perricelli, Lynne Moss. “Oil Painting: Malcolm T. Liepke: The Emotional Connection in Figure Paintings.” 15 Oct 2006. Artist Daily. Web. Accessed 20 July 2013. <>

p.s. It was curiously difficult to find images of his work, and many of them do not have titles. Sorry!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s